ALGORITHMIC MANAGEMENT IN HRM: AN ANALYSIS OF ITS IMPACT ON EMPLOYEE AUTONOMY, ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE, AND PRODUCTIVITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62207/6f3fpj86Keywords:
Algorithmic Management, Employee Autonomy, Organizational Justice, Productivity, AI-HRM, IndonesiaAbstract
The transformation of human resource management (HRM) has undergone a fundamental shift toward algorithmic management (AM) driven by artificial intelligence (AI) and big data analytics. This study aims to analyze the impact of AM implementation on employee autonomy, perceptions of organizational justice, and productivity, particularly within the context of digital transformation in developing countries such as Indonesia. Using a narrative review approach, this study systematically synthesizes literature published over the last decade from the Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases concerning algorithmic control in both platform-based and conventional organizations. The findings reveal the emergence of a “productivity–well-being paradox,” in which increased operational efficiency is frequently accompanied by a decline in employee autonomy, reflected in the shift from discretionary decision-making toward algorithmic conformity. Furthermore, the opacity of black-box algorithms was found to reduce perceptions of procedural justice and weaken employee trust in organizational decision-making processes. The study concludes that effective implementation of AM requires the integration of principles from Self-Determination Theory and Organizational Justice Theory through transparent, accountable, and human-centered governance mechanisms. Such an approach is essential to mitigate negative psychosocial consequences, including technostress and burnout, while maintaining organizational productivity and employee well-being.
References
Aşkun, D., Yeloğlu, H. O., & Yıldırım, O. B. (2017). Are Self‐Efficacious Individuals more Sensitive to Organizational Justice Issues? The Influence of Self‐Efficacy on the Relationship between Justice Perceptions and Turnover. European Management Review, 15(2), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12161
At-tamimi, R. M. R., Abidin, A., & Amiruddin, A. (2024). INTEGRATING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTO SUCCESSION PLANNING AND LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION. ICOBUSS, 209–228. https://doi.org/10.24034/icobuss.v4i1.496
Boudrias, J., Desrumaux, P., Gaudreau, P., Nelson, K., Brunet, L., & Savoie, A. (2011). Modeling the experience of psychological health at work: The role of personal resources, social-organizational resources, and job demands. International Journal of Stress Management, 18(4), 372–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025353
Chen, X., Zhang, D., & Yang, X. (2024). Is It Influence or Pressure? A Study on the Dual Path Impact of Self-Sacrificial Leadership on Employee Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Open Journal of Business and Management, 12(01), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2024.121022
Chhillar, D., & Aguilera, R. V. (2022). An Eye for Artificial Intelligence: Insights Into the Governance of Artificial Intelligence and Vision for Future Research. Business & Society, 61(5), 1197–1241. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503221080959
Chou, S. Y., Nguyen, T., Ramser, C., & Chang, T. (2021). Impact of basic psychological needs on organizational justice and helping behavior: a self-determination perspective. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(8), 3747–3765. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-08-2019-0372
Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., Joel-Edgar, S., Bhattacharya, S., Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Abadie, A., & Truong, L. (2023). Unlocking the value of artificial intelligence in human resource management through AI capability framework. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100899
Cisco. (2024). AI readiness index 2024 Indonesia.
Cisco AI Readiness Index 2024 Indonesia
Ghani, B., Hyder, S. I., Yoo, S., & Han, H. (2023). Does employee engagement promote innovation? The Facilitators of innovative workplace behavior via mediation and moderation. Heliyon, 9(11), e21817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21817
Gupta, B., Wang, K. Y., & Cai, W. (2020). Interactional justice and willingness to share tacit knowledge: perceived cost as a mediator, and respectful engagement as moderator. Personnel Review, 50(2), 478–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-08-2019-0436
Hong, W., & Chen, C. (2024). Ethical Concerns Upon Artificial Intelligence Empowered Human Resource Management: A Qualitative Study among Middle-level Managers from Beijing Technology Companies. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28860
Johnson, B., Coggburn, J. D., & Llorens, J. J. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Public Human Resource Management: Questions for Research and Practice. Public Personnel Management, 51(4), 538–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260221126498
Jong, J. de, & Schalk, R. (2009). Extrinsic Motives as Moderators in the Relationship Between Fairness and Work-Related Outcomes Among Temporary Workers. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(1), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9139-8
Kasubi, J. W., Kisumbe, L. A., & Nyabakora, W. I. (2025). Mapping the Knowledge Base for the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Human Resources Management: A Bibliometric Study. Sage Open, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251377298
Kertechian, K. S., & El-Farr, H. (2024). Dissecting the Paradox of Progress: The Socioeconomic Implications of Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1004872
Mennens, K., Becker, M., Briker, R., Mahr, D., & Steins, M. (2024). I Care That You Don’t Share: Confidentiality in Student-Robot Interactions. Journal of Service Research, 28(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705241295849
Microsoft & LinkedIn. (2024). Work trend index 2024: The state of AI at work in Indonesia. Microsoft Indonesia.
Microsoft Indonesia – Work Trend Index 2024
Olafsen, A. H., Halvari, H., Forest, J., & Deci, E. L. (2015). Show them the money? The role of pay, managerial need support, and justice in a self‐determination theory model of intrinsic work motivation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56(4), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12211
Petegem, S. V., Trinkner, R., Kaap‐Deeder, J. van der, Antonietti, J., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2021). Police procedural justice and adolescents’ internalization of the law: Integrating self‐determination theory into legal socialization research. Journal of Social Issues, 77(2), 336–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12425
Pratama, A. W., & Parahyanti, E. (2019). Counterproductive Work Behavior Among Government Employees: The Role of Basic Psychological Needs, Compensation, and Organizational Justice. https://doi.org/10.2991/iciap-18.2019.64
PwC Indonesia. (2024). Indonesian companies lagging in generative AI adoption: PwC survey.
Rane, N. L. (2024). Role and challenges of ChatGPT, Gemini, and similar generative artificial intelligence in human resource management. Studies in Economics and Business Relations, 5(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.48185/sebr.v5i1.1001
Razzak, M. R., Khan, G. M., & AlAbri, S. (2021). Inclusion and employee engagement of nonfamily employees in family firms: moderating influence of procedural justice. Journal of Family Business Management, 12(4), 708–728. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfbm-11-2020-0103
Reuters. (2025, October 8). Most companies suffer some risk-related financial loss deploying AI, EY survey.
Reuters. (2026, January 19). Young workers are most worried about AI affecting jobs, Randstad survey shows.
Reuters – EY Global AI Risk Survey 2025
Reuters – Randstad AI Worker Survey 2026
Sæther, E. A. (2020). Creativity-Contingent Rewards, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creativity: The Importance of Fair Reward Evaluation Procedures. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00974
SAP. (2024). GenAI priorities among Indonesian midmarket businesses.
SAP Southeast Asia – GenAI in Indonesian Midmarket Business
Selar, A. N., Falkenberg, H., Hellgren, J., Gagné, M., & Sverke, M. (2020). “It’s [Not] All ‘Bout the Money”: How do Performance-based Pay and Support of Psychological Needs Variables Relate to Job Performance? Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.107
Song, X., Lowman, G. H., & Harms, P. D. (2020). Justice for the Crowd: Organizational Justice and Turnover in Crowd-Based Labor. Administrative Sciences, 10(4), 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040093
Soyer, C. R., Balkin, D. B., & Fall, A. (2021). Unpacking the effect of autonomous motivation on workplace performance: Engagement and distributive justice matter! European Management Review, 19(1), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12476
Stan, R., & Vîrgă, D. (2021). Psychological needs matter more than social and organizational resources in explaining organizational commitment. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 62(4), 552–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12739
Tang, X., Mai, S., Wang, L., & Na, M. (2025). The Influence of Organizational Fairness, Identity and Empowerment on Employee Creativity: Mediating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility. Sage Open, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251328475
Tausch, A., Kluge, A., & Adolph, L. (2020). Psychological Effects of the Allocation Process in Human–Robot Interaction – A Model for Research on ad hoc Task Allocation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564672
Tsiskaridze, R., Reinhold, K., & Järvis, M. (2023). Innovating HRM Recruitment: A Comprehensive Review Of AI Deployment. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 14(4), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2023.4-18
Tuffaha, M. (n.d.). Adoption Factors of Artificial intelligence in Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.4995/thesis/10251/185909
Ugaddan, R. G., & Park, S. M. (2018). Do Trustful Leadership, Organizational Justice, and Motivation Influence Whistle-Blowing Intention? Evidence From Federal Employees. Public Personnel Management, 48(1), 56–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026018783009
Wang, N., Zhang, X., Li, S., & Xue, G. (2025). Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Enterprise Human Resource Management. Information Resources Management Journal, 38(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.389707
World Economic Forum. (2025). The future of jobs report 2025. World Economic Forum.
World Economic Forum – Future of Jobs Report 2025
Younas, M. Z., Saeed, I., QADIR, G., & KHAN, S. U. (2021). Effect of Organizational Justice on Turnover Intention: Mediating Role of Employee Motivation. Journal of Business & Tourism, 1(2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.34260/jbt.v1i2.20
Zhang, M. M., Cooke, F. L., Ahlström, D., & McNeil, N. (2025). The Rise of Algorithmic Management and Implications for Work and Organisations. New Technology Work and Employment, 40(3), 659–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12343
Zikri, A. F. N. A., Widianto, S., & Komaladewi, R. (2024). Sustainable Human Resource Management: A Transformation Perspective of HRM Functions Through Optimized Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Business and Management Applications. https://doi.org/10.17358/jabm.10.2.557
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ashabul Yamin (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

















