DINAMIKA HYBRID WORK DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT DAN ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT

Ashabul Yamin

doi:10.62207/hv3mme09

Authors

Ashabul Yamin STIS Harsyi Lombok Tengah, NTB, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62207/hv3mme09

Keywords:

Hybrid Work, Employee Engagement, Organizational Commitment, Teori JD-R, Fleksibilitas Kerja.

Abstract

Transformasi lanskap ketenagakerjaan global pasca-pandemi telah memicu pergeseran masif menuju model kerja hibrida (hybrid work), namun adopsi ini sering kali tidak dibarengi dengan kesiapan kebijakan organisasi yang memadai. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dinamika hybrid work dan implikasinya terhadap employee engagement serta organizational commitment dengan mengintegrasikan kerangka Job Demands-Resources (JD-R), social exchange theory, dan person-environment fit. Menggunakan metode tinjauan literatur sistematis dan analisis naratif terhadap artikel bereputasi internasional, studi ini menemukan bahwa hybrid work berfungsi sebagai pedang bermata dua (double-edged sword). Di satu sisi, otonomi spasial dan fleksibilitas bertindak sebagai sumber daya motivasional yang meningkatkan vigor dan absorption. Di sisi lain, tuntutan seperti technostress, isolasi sosial, dan kaburnya batas kerja berisiko menurunkan dedication serta affective commitment. Hasil sintesis menegaskan bahwa keberhasilan model hibrida sangat bergantung pada kualitas boundary management, dukungan organisasi, dan pergeseran menuju manajemen berbasis hasil. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan pendekatan manajerial yang adaptif untuk memastikan keterikatan karyawan tetap terjaga di tengah disrupsi digital.

References

AKIN, Ö., & Reyhanoğlu, M. (2025). Employee Anxiety and Job Satisfaction: The Mediating Roles of Workload and Work Stress. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 45(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22301

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Statistik tenaga kerja Indonesia 2023.

Bilderback, S., & Kilpatrick, M. D. (2024). Global perspectives on redefining workplace presence: the impact of remote work on organizational culture. Journal of Ethics in Entrepreneurship and Technology, 4(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeet-08-2024-0023

Bleakley, A., Rough, D., Edwards, J., Doyle, P., Dumbleton, O., Clark, L., Rintel, S., Wade, V., & Cowan, B. R. (2021). Bridging Social Distance During Social Distancing: Exploring Social Talk and Remote Collegiality in Video Conferencing. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2109.14965

Booker, L., Mowbray, P. K., Townsend, K., & Chan, X. W. (2025). Technology and Its Influence on Teleworker Well‐Being: A Systematic Review. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 63(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.70019

Botha, D., Dijk, G. van, & Marais, A. (2023). The COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives on work engagement and work-from-home in a higher education institution. Sa Journal of Human Resource Management, 21. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v21i0.2131

Bravo-Duarte, F., Rodríguez, I., & Tordera, N. (2025). Leading from afar: Development and validation of the leadership competencies for telework scale. Journal of Management & Organization, 31(5), 2449–2468. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2025.10011

Bullock, A. N., Colvin, A. D., & Jackson, M. S. (2021). “All Zoomed Out”: Strategies for Addressing Zoom Fatigue in the Age of COVID-19. 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90677-1_6

Burchi, S., & Samuk, Ş. (2022). Being a nomad in one’s home: The case of Italian women during Covid-19. Cambio Rivista Sulle Trasformazioni Sociali, 11(22), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.36253/cambio-10778

Contreras, F., Baykal, E., & Abid, G. (2020). E-Leadership and Teleworking in Times of COVID-19 and Beyond: What We Know and Where Do We Go. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.590271

Dicu, A., Rybnikova, I., & Steger, T. (2022). How do employees cope with mandatory working from home during COVID-19? German Journal of Human Resource Management Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung, 36(3), 300–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/23970022221079049

Döring, N., Moor, K. D., Fiedler, M., Schoenenberg, K., & Raake, A. (2022). Videoconference Fatigue: A Conceptual Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2061. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042061

DUROG, M. R. O., & Resurreccion, P. F. (2024). Organizational Identification as a Mediator of Organizational Support, Employee Engagement, and Commitment: The Case of Non-Teaching Employees in the Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology (MSU-IIT). Journal of Human Resource Management – Hr Advances and Developments, 2024(2), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.46287/uwwt1370

Dutta, D., & Mishra, S. K. (2023). “Technology is killing me!”: the moderating effect of organization home-work interface on the linkage between technostress and stress at work. Information Technology and People, 37(6), 2203–2222. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-03-2022-0169

Eðvarðsson, I. R., & Gardarsdottir, J. (2023). Navigating Uncharted Waters: Exploring Leaders’ Challenges in the Era of COVID-19 and the Rise of Telework. Sustainability, 15(23), 16471. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316471

Einolander, J. (2016). Organizational commitment and employee engagement: A cross-case analysis.

Einolander, J. (2016). Organizational Commitment and Engagement in Two Finnish Energy Sector Organizations. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 26(3), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20664

Fay, M. J. (2011). Informal communication of co‐workers: a thematic analysis of messages. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management an International Journal, 6(3), 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465641111188394

Ferdous, T., Ali, M., Desouza, K. C., & French, E. (2025). An integrated framework of remote work from organizational adoption to employee outcomes: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.70002

Ferrara, B., Pansini, M., Vincenzi, C. D., Buonomo, I., & Benevene, P. (2022). Investigating the Role of Remote Working on Employees’ Performance and Well-Being: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12373. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912373

Figueiredo, E., & Margaça, C. (2025). Loneliness and Isolation in the Era of Telework: A Comprehensive Review of Challenges for Organizational Success. Healthcare, 13(16), 1943. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13161943

Gallup. (2024). State of the Global Workplace Report 2024.

Ganguly, A., Joseph, J. M., Dutta, S., & Dey, K. (2022). Exploring the Employer–Employee Relationship: A Management Versus Employee Perspective of the Vicissitudes in the Virtual Workplace. Global Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509221086353

Guțu, I., & Medeleanu, C. (2023). Assessing Teleworkforce and Electronic Leadership Favorable for an Online Workforce Sustainability Framework by Using PLS SEM. Sustainability, 15(18), 13615. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813615

Hagemann, V., & Klug, K. (2022). Human Resource Management in a Digital Environment. 35–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04063-4_3

Hilty, D. M., Armstrong, C. M., Smout, S. A., Crawford, A., Maheu, M. M., Drude, K. P., Chan, S., Yellowlees, P., & Krupinski, E. A. (2022). Findings and Guidelines on Provider Technology, Fatigue, and Well-being: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(5), e34451. https://doi.org/10.2196/34451

Hoelscher, G. L., Morton, D. S., Sanderson, B. N., Noble, J. F., Bullard, M. J., & Swiderski, D. (2022). Virtual Healthcare Simulation. Simulation in Healthcare the Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 17(5), 322–328. https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000658

International Monetary Fund. (2023). Workforce mobility and labor trends report.

Jain, S., Devi, S., & Kumar, V. (2023). Remote working and its facilitative nuances: visualizing the intellectual structure and setting future research agenda. Management Research Review, 47(5), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-01-2022-0057

Jindain, C., & Gilitwala, B. (2023). The factors impacting the intermediating variable of employee engagement toward employee performance in a hybrid working model. Rajagiri Management Journal, 18(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1108/ramj-08-2023-0237

Jindain, K., & Gilitwala, B. (2023). Employee engagement in hybrid work environments.

Kaiser, S., Suess, S., Cohen, R. L., Mikkelsen, E. N., & Pedersen, A. R. (2022). Working from home: Findings and prospects for further research. German Journal of Human Resource Management Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung, 36(3), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/23970022221106973

Kamarapu, S., Swami, P., & Chaturvedi, S. (2023). Impact of Home-based Teleworking During Pandemic on Telecommuters’ Organizational Commitment: Interaction of Gender and Family Status. Metamorphosis, 22(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/09726225231222069

Kirshenbaum, N., Davidson, K., Harden, J., North, C., Kobayashi, D., Theriot, R., Tabalba, R., Rogers, M. L., Belcaid, M., Burks, A., Bharadwaj, K. N., Renambot, L., Johnson, A., Long, L., & Leigh, J. (2021). Traces of Time through Space. Proceedings of the Acm on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(ISS), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3488552

Kulikowski, K., Przytuła, S., Sułkowski, Ł., & Rašticová, M. (2022). Technostress of students during COVID-19 - a sign of the time? Human Technology, 18(3), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2022.18-3.3

Kumar, Mr. K. S., & Saxena, Mr. S. R. (2024). Assessing the Impact of Remote Work and Flexible Work Schedule on Employee Engagement in Corporate Organizations. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(3), 1371–1376. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.0324.0660

Li, B. J., & Yee, A. Z. H. (2022). Understanding videoconference fatigue: a systematic review of dimensions, antecedents and theories. Internet Research, 33(2), 796–819. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-07-2021-0499

Mahapatra, M., & Ford, D. P. (2024). Technostress and disengagement from knowledge sharing: insights from pre-pandemic and mid-pandemic data sets. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(9), 2689–2711. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-08-2023-0711

McKeown, T., & Cochrane, R. (2017). Independent professionals and the potential for HRM innovation. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1414–1433. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-09-2016-0256

Meng, J., Suárez, L., Yip, C. C. E., & Marsh, N. V. (2025). White-Collar Workers in the Post-Pandemic Era: A Review of Risk and Protective Factors for Mental Well-Being. Behavioral Sciences, 15(10), 1313. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101313

Monachos, K., & Fragouli, E. (2023). Remote Work and New Employment Models in the Post Covid-19 Era: A Case Study of Greece. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, 1(5), 181–221. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejtas.2023.1(5).13

Naqshbandi, M. M. (2025). Beyond Office Walls: Rethinking Management Practices in the Hybrid Workspace. Fiib Business Review, 14(4), 391–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/30499240251356878

OECD. (2023). Employment outlook 2023: The impact of hybrid work.

Orosa, B. (2023). Hybrid onboarding and organizational commitment.

Orosa, H. G. P. (2023). LEVEL OF ATTITUDE TOWARDS ONBOARDING ON EMPLOYEES’ ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT: BASIS FOR EFFECTIVE HYBRID ONBOARDING PROGRAM. Social Values and Society, 5(2), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.26480/svs.02.2023.46.53

Pansini, M., Buonomo, I., Vincenzi, C. D., Ferrara, B., & Benevene, P. (2023). Positioning Technostress in the JD-R Model Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review. Healthcare, 11(3), 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11030446

Pelton, D. (2025). Grave gaps in burnout perception. 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000454-003

Peprah, E. O. (2023). Hybrid workplace: current status, positives, negatives, challenges, and team learning. The Learning Organization, 31(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/tlo-11-2022-0150

Philip, J., & Kosmidou, V. (2022). How proactive personality and ICT-enabled technostress creators configure as drivers of job crafting. Journal of Management & Organization, 29(4), 724–744. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2022.56

Pianese, T., Errichiello, L., & Cunha, J. V. da. (2022). Organizational control in the context of remote working: A synthesis of empirical findings and a research agenda. European Management Review, 20(2), 326–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12515

Purba, J. et al. (2025). Hybrid work and employee commitment: Mediating roles of work-life balance.

Purba, S. D., Nilawati, L., Nugroho, Y. A. B., Darmoyo, S., & Alves, S. (2025). Implementation of a hybrid working system: Can it increase millennial workers’ commitment in greater Jakarta? Human Systems Management, 44(1), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.3233/hsm-230218

Qin, Y. (2024). Leadership communication and employee engagement in remote work.

Qin, Y. S. (2024). How internal listening inspires remote employee engagement: examining the mediating effects of perceived organizational support and affective organizational commitment. Journal of Communication Management, 28(4), 553–572. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-11-2023-0117

Ramachandaran, S. D., Thet, K. Z. Z., Qalati, S. A., Doraisingam, P., Malek, B. A., & Kumari, S. (2024). Human Resource Management Strategies for Engagement and Talent Attraction in Hybrid Work Models. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(7). https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i7.4394

Ramachandaran, S. et al. (2024). HR strategies in hybrid work environments.

Riedl‬, R. (2021). On the stress potential of videoconferencing: definition and root causes of Zoom fatigue. Electronic Markets, 32(1), 153–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00501-3

Riglea, S., Rus, C., & Raţiu, L. (2021). The mediating role of the work-family conflict in the relationship between technostress and psychological well-being in the COVID-19 pandemic context. Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.24837/pru.v19i2.497

Rosado, M. E. B., Suárez, L. M. C., Zevallos, G. F. D. O. de, & Espinosa‐Cristia, J. F. (2023). Technostress at work during the COVID-19 lockdown phase (2020–2021): a systematic review of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1173425

Rupčić, N. (2024). Working and learning in a hybrid workplace: challenges and opportunities. The Learning Organization, 31(2), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/tlo-02-2024-303

Salem, M. R. M. (2025). Designing Future-Ready Workplaces: How Gen Z’s Preferred Work Type Influence Retention Intention; Mediating Role of Perceived Autonomy in Malaysian SMEs. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7147082/v1

Santiago-Torner, C. (2025). Moderating Effects of Telework Intensity on the Relationship Between Ethical Climate, Affective Commitment and Burnout in the Colombian Electricity Sector Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. Behavioral Sciences, 15(10), 1409. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101409

Saridakis, G., Georgellis, Y., Benson, V., Garcia, S. M., Johnstone, S., & Lai, Y. (2023). Guest editorial: Work from home (WFH), employee productivity and wellbeing: lessons from COVID-19 and future implications. Information Technology and People, 36(5), 1757–1765. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-08-2023-993

Schweitzer, L., Smith, C. J., Lyons, S., & Kostuchuk, J. (2025). Working where we want: The role of work arrangement fit in work-related and personal wellbeing. Journal of Management & Organization, 31(6), 2660–2678. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2025.10024

Schweitzer, L. et al. (2025). Person-environment fit in hybrid work contexts.

Sharabi, M., Shlomi, A., & Sharabi, S. (2024). Employee engagement and work centrality in times of crisis. International Journal of Social Sciences Perspectives, 14(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.33094/ijssp.v14i1.1448

Sharabi, M. et al. (2024). Work mode differences in employee engagement.

Sholesi, O. Y., Kolawole, A., & Olorunisola, I. (2023). Telecommuting and Normative Commitment of Employees in a Technology Firm: After Effects of Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 15(3(J)), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v15i3(j).3644

Silva, A. B. da, Castelló‐Sirvent, F., & Darós, L. C. (2022). Sensible Leaders and Hybrid Working: Challenges for Talent Management. Sustainability, 14(24), 16883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416883

Silva, A. J., & Damas, H. (2025). Hybrid Connections: Unveiling Emotional Intelligence’s Influence on Hybrid Work Perceptions and Job Performance. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 28. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2025.10008

Siyambalapitiya, N., & Wickramarachchi, R. (2022). An exploration of the psychological factors affecting on information technology employees in Sri Lanka due to the concept of work from home during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Science of the University of Kelaniya, 15(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.4038/josuk.v15i2.8062

Spagnoli, P., Manuti, A., Buono, C., & Ghislieri, C. (2021). The Good, the Bad and the Blend: The Strategic Role of the “Middle Leadership” in Work-Family/Life Dynamics during Remote Working. Behavioral Sciences, 11(8), 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11080112

Stoian, C.-A., Caraiani, C., Anica-Popa, I., Dascălu, C., & Lungu, C. I. (2022). Telework Systematic Model Design for the Future of Work. Sustainability, 14(12), 7146. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127146

Tan, R., & Antonio, F. (2022). New insights on employee adaptive performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Innovation, 18(2), 175–206. https://doi.org/10.7341/20221826

Toscano, F., & Zappalà, S. (2020). Social Isolation and Stress as Predictors of Productivity Perception and Remote Work Satisfaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Concern about the Virus in a Moderated Double Mediation. Sustainability, 12(23), 9804. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239804

United Nations. (2023). Work-life balance and remote work report.

Urrejola-Contreras, G. P. (2023). Relationship between mental fatigue and burnout syndrome in remote workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: an integrative review. Revista Brasileira De Medicina Do Trabalho, 21(03), 01–08. https://doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2022-1003

Ürü, F. O., Gözükara, E., & Tezcan, L. (2022). The Moderating Roles of Remote, Hybrid, and Onsite Working on the Relationship between Work Engagement and Organizational Identification during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 14(24), 16828. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416828

Ürü, F. O. et al. (2022). Work engagement and organizational identification across work modes.

Vasić, M. (2020). Challenges of teleworking during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anali Ekonomskog Fakulteta U Subotici, (44), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.5937/aneksub2044063v

Vincenzi, C. D., Pansini, M., Ferrara, B., Buonomo, I., & Benevene, P. (2022). Consequences of COVID-19 on Employees in Remote Working: Challenges, Risks and Opportunities An Evidence-Based Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), 11672. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811672

Wang, W., Albert, L. J., & Sun, Q. (2020). Employee isolation and telecommuter organizational commitment. Employee Relations the International Journal, 42(3), 609–625. https://doi.org/10.1108/er-06-2019-0246

World Bank. (2023). Digital development report.

World Bank Indonesia. (2023). Indonesia labor market report.

World Economic Forum. (2024). Future of Jobs Report 2024.

Yusriani, S., Patiro, S. P. S., Lusiati, M., & Nurbaeti, N. (2023). Exploring the Dynamics and Implications of Remote Work during and post-COVID-19: A Qualitative Analysis. Proceeding of the International Seminar on Business Economics Social Science and Technology (Isbest), 3(1). https://doi.org/10.33830/isbest.v3i1.1259

Yusuf, M., & Nuraeni, N. (2023). DETERMINANT JOB INVOLVEMENT, AND CAREER DEVELOPMENT ON JOB SATISFACTION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT. Sosiohumaniora, 25(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v25i1.38649

Zeavin, H. (2021). MANAGING BOUNDARIES WHILE WORKING FROM HOME, 1960-PRESENT. Aoir Selected Papers of Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2021i0.12113