MICRO INFLUENCERS AND AUTHENTICITY: THE NEW FACE OF TRUST IN SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING

Authors

  • Donal Anry Jaya Sinurat Universitas Nusa Cendana, Kupang, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia Author
  • Midian Immanuel Sihombing Universitas Nusa Cendana, Kupang, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia Author
  • Hardo Aprilio Universitas Nusa Cendana, Kupang, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia Author
  • Sergius Fribontius Bon Universitas Nusa Cendana, Kupang, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia Author
  • Agus Oniel Galaska Universitas Efarina, Pematang Siantar, North Sumatera, Indonesia Author
  • Jolio Toga Estrada Sinurat Universitas Efarina, Pematang Siantar, North Sumatera, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62207/07kkbb32

Keywords:

micro influencer, authenticity, consumer trust, social media marketing, engagement, content relevance

Abstract

The rise of micro-influencers has reshaped the dynamics of social media marketing by shifting the emphasis from celebrity endorsements to authenticity-based consumer engagement. Micro-influencers, typically those with a moderate follower base, are known for fostering closer, more relatable, and interactive relationships with their audiences compared to macro-influencers. This study explores the influence of perceived authenticity, content relevance, and engagement frequency on consumer trust in micro-influencers, particularly on platforms such as Instagram and TikTok. Employing a quantitative descriptive approach, the research gathered insights from young Indonesian social media users who actively follow micro-influencers. The analysis reveals that authenticity plays a central role in trust formation, while content relevance and interaction frequency serve as supporting elements that strengthen consumer perception and engagement. These findings align with the commitment–trust theory and parasocial interaction framework, highlighting that consistent, emotionally engaging, and culturally relevant content is essential in cultivating trust in the digital space. The study contributes to the theoretical discourse on influencer marketing and trust, while offering actionable implications for brands and marketers aiming to build meaningful and loyal consumer relationships. It suggests that in an era marked by increasing commercial saturation and consumer skepticism, authenticity is not merely a strategic advantage, it is a foundational necessity for long-term brand success in social media ecosystems.

References

Audrezet, A., de Kerviler, G., & Moulard, J. G. (2020). Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008

Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2020). Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership. Journal of Business Research, 117, 510–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.005

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035

Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017). Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009

Djafarova, E., & Trofimenko, O. (2019). ‘Instafamous’ – credibility and self-presentation of micro-celebrities on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1432–1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1438491

Edelman. (2023). Edelman Trust Barometer 2023: Global Report. https://www.edelman.com/trust/2023-trust-barometer

Evans, N. J., Phua, J., Lim, J., & Jun, H. (2017). Disclosing Instagram influencer advertising: The effects of disclosure language on advertising recognition, attitudes, and behavioral intent. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 17(2), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2017.1366885

Influencer Marketing Hub. (2024). Influencer Marketing Benchmark Report 2024. https://influencermarketinghub.com/influencer-marketing-benchmark-report-2024/

Kay, S., Mulcahy, R., & Parkinson, J. (2020). When less is more: The impact of macro and micro social media influencers’ disclosure. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3-4), 248–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2020.1718740

Labrecque, L. I. (2014). Fostering consumer–brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.003

Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501

Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment–trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800302

Moulard, J. G., Garrity, C. P., & Rice, D. H. (2015). What makes a human brand authentic? Identifying the antecedents of celebrity authenticity. Psychology & Marketing, 32(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20771

Napoli, J., Dickinson, S. J., Beverland, M. B., & Farrelly, F. (2014). Measuring consumer-based brand authenticity. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1090–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.06.001

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

We Are Social & Meltwater. (2024). Digital 2024: Global Overview Report. https://wearesocial.com/digital-2024/

Downloads

Published

2025-05-31

How to Cite

MICRO INFLUENCERS AND AUTHENTICITY: THE NEW FACE OF TRUST IN SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING. (2025). Management Studies and Business Journal (PRODUCTIVITY), 2(5), 2534-2543. https://doi.org/10.62207/07kkbb32