Enhancing Quality Management through Advanced Statistical Techniques
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62207/vbrcgz16Keywords:
Machine Learning, Quality Management, Process Optimization, High Variability Production, Dynamic SystemsAbstract
Production environments with high variability present challenges in maintaining quality consistency, which are difficult to address using traditional approaches. This research aims to evaluate the impact of machine learning (ML)-based optimization on long-term quality management in industrial sectors that experience high production fluctuations. Using a systematic literature review approach with the PRISMA method, this research analyzes 18 studies related to the implementation of ML in quality process optimization. Results show that ML significantly supports product stability, defect reduction, and sustainable operational efficiency. The implications of this research strengthen the application of ML as a relevant and effective method for improving long-term quality in dynamic production environments.
References
Alshammari, T., Ramadan, R., & Ahmad, A. (2023). Temporal variations dataset for indoor environmental parameters in northern saudi arabia. Applied Sciences, 13(12), 7326. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13127326
Aslam, M., Xue, C., Wang, K., Yun-sheng, C., Zhang, A., Cai, W., … & Cui, D. (2019). Svm based classification and prediction system for gastric cancer using dominant features of saliva. Nano Biomedicine and Engineering, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.5101/nbe.v12i1.p1-13
Çakıt, E. and Dağdeviren, M. (2023). Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for predicting standard time in a manufacturing environment. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing, 37. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0890060422000245
Dhillon, S., Ganggayah, M., Sinnadurai, S., Lió, P., & Taib, N. (2022). Theory and practice of integrating machine learning and conventional statistics in medical data analysis. Diagnostics, 12(10), 2526. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102526
Giroh, H. (2023). Improving the performance of hybrid models using machine learning and optimization techniques. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(2), 3396-3409. https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i2.3138
Jordan, M. and Mitchell, T. (2015). Machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science, 349(6245), 255-260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8415
Kaushik, P. (2011). Relevance of six sigma line of attack in smes: a case study of a die casting manufacturing unit. Journal of Engineering & Technology, 1(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-8580.86644
Kumar, N., Sundaram, K., R, N., & Madhumathi, S. (2023). Optimizing energy consumption in smart homes using machine learning techniques. E3s Web of Conferences, 387, 02002. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338702002
Kumar, S. (2024). Proactive system maintenance: machine learning models for predicting and preventing potential system failures. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 12(5), 1846-1851. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.61922
Mayormente, M. (2024). Improving abiotic stress mitigation via predictive modeling of water quality parameters in recirculated aquaculture systems. jes, 20(3s), 1382-1389. https://doi.org/10.52783/jes.1515
Menichetti, G., Ravandi, B., Mozaffarian, D., & Barabási, A. (2023). Machine learning prediction of the degree of food processing. Nature Communications, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37457-1
Muñoz-Villamizar, A., Rafavy, C., & Casey, J. (2020). Machine learning and optimization-based modeling for asset management: a case study. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(4), 1149-1163. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-05-2020-0206
Nelyub, V. (2023). Machine learning to identify key success indicators. E3s Web of Conferences, 431, 05014. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202343105014
Sony, M. and Naik, S. (2012). Six sigma, organizational learning and innovation. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 29(8), 915-936. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656711211258535
Susto, G., Schirru, A., Pampuri, S., McLoone, S., & Beghi, A. (2015). Machine learning for predictive maintenance: a multiple classifier approach. Ieee Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 11(3), 812-820. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2014.2349359
Wu, Z., Alnajdi, A., Gu, Q., & Christofides, P. (2022). Statistical machine‐learning–based predictive control of uncertain nonlinear processes. Aiche Journal, 68(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.17642
Wu, Z., Tran, A., Rincón, D., & Christofides, P. (2019). Machine‐learning‐based predictive control of nonlinear processes. part ii: computational implementation. Aiche Journal, 65(11). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16734
Zhang, H. and Moon, S. (2021). Reviews on machine learning approaches for process optimization in noncontact direct ink writing. Acs Applied Materials & Interfaces, 13(45), 53323-53345. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c04544
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Cahyo Adi Nugroho, Janatika Putra Perdana, Dendy Tirtoadisuryo, Asep Ferry Rachmat, Irwan Syah Erlangga (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

















