Supply Chain Resilience: Strategies for Mitigating Disruptions and Enhancing Business Continuity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62207/c9d72257Keywords:
risk management, supply chain, small companies, large companies, systematic literature reviewAbstract
In the context of globalization and market volatility, supply chain resilience has become critical for the continuity of business operations. This research analyzes differences in supply chain risk management practices between small and large companies in facing disruptions. Using the systematic literature review method, researchers collected and analyzed related articles from various international databases. The analysis results show that small companies tend to adopt simpler and reactive risk management strategies, while large companies have a more structured and proactive approach. The implication of this research is the need for a risk management approach that is tailored to the size and characteristics of the company to increase supply chain resilience.
References
Alazab, M., Alhyari, S., Awajan, A., & Abdallah, A. (2020). Blockchain technology in supply chain management: an empirical study of the factors affecting user adoption/acceptance. Cluster Computing, 24(1), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-020-03200-4
Belhadi, A., Mani, V., Kamble, S., Khan, S., & Verma, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence-driven innovation for enhancing supply chain resilience and performance under the effect of supply chain dynamism: an empirical investigation. Annals of Operations Research, 333(2-3), 627-652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-03956-x
Boffelli, A., Golini, R., Orzes, G., & Dotti, S. (2020). Open the box: a behavioural perspective on the reshoring decision-making and implementation process. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26(3), 100623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2020.100623
Cooper, M. (2024). Understanding gender equality initiatives and supply chain resilience in sustainability practices.. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4278530/v1
Etemadi, N., Gelder, P., & Strozzi, F. (2021). An ism modeling of barriers for blockchain/distributed ledger technology adoption in supply chains towards cybersecurity. Sustainability, 13(9), 4672. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094672
Geng, N. (2024). Optimizing the resilience of the fresh agricultural product supply chain considering supply chain disruptions.. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4081137/v1
Gunessee, S. and Subramanian, N. (2020). Ambiguity and its coping mechanisms in supply chains lessons from the covid-19 pandemic and natural disasters. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(7/8), 1201-1223. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-07-2019-0530
Gurtu, A. and Johny, J. (2021). Supply chain risk management: literature review. Risks, 9(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9010016
Manathunge, K., Samaraweera, V., Withanage, W., Karunarathna, W., Weligodapola, M., & Madhavika, W. (2021). Fostering resilience of smes to supply chain disruptions: the role of relationships. Sliit Business Review, 01(02), 71-94. https://doi.org/10.54389/vhou3544
Mathiyazhagan, K., Mujumdar, A., & Appolloni, A. (2023). Guest editorial: resilience in sustainable supply chain post-covid-19: future pathways. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 34(4), 873-878. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlm-07-2023-603
Ni, S., Peng, Y., Peng, K., & Liu, Z. (2022). Supply chain demand forecast based on ssa-xgboost model. Journal of Computer and Communications, 10(12), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2022.1012006
Nikookar, E. and Yanadori, Y. (2021). Preparing supply chain for the next disruption beyond covid-19: managerial antecedents of supply chain resilience. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 42(1), 59-90. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-04-2021-0272
Özdemir, D., Sharma, M., Dhir, A., & Daim, T. (2022). Supply chain resilience during the covid-19 pandemic. Technology in Society, 68, 101847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101847
Pu, G., Qiao, W., & Feng, Z. (2023). Antecedents and outcomes of supply chain resilience: integrating dynamic capabilities and relational perspective. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 31(4), 706-726. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12473
Rajaguru, R. and Matanda, M. (2019). Role of compatibility and supply chain process integration in facilitating supply chain capabilities and organizational performance. Supply Chain Management an International Journal, 24(2), 301-316. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-05-2017-0187
Roscoe, S., Skipworth, H., Aktaş, E., & Habib, F. (2020). Managing supply chain uncertainty arising from geopolitical disruptions: evidence from the pharmaceutical industry and brexit. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(9), 1499-1529. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-10-2019-0668
Sánchez, M. and Batista, M. (2023). Business continuity for times of vulnerability: empirical evidence. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 31(3), 431-440. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12449
Um, J. and Han, N. (2020). Understanding the relationships between global supply chain risk and supply chain resilience: the role of mitigating strategies. Supply Chain Management an International Journal, 26(2), 240-255. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-06-2020-0248
Wang, M., Arisian, S., Wood, L., & Wang, B. (2020). Logistics innovation capability and its impacts on the supply chain risks in the industry 4.0 era. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, 2(2), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1108/mscra-07-2019-0015
Yu, W., Jacobs, M., Chávez, R., & Yang, J. (2019). Dynamism, disruption orientation, and resilience in the supply chain and the impacts on financial performance: a dynamic capabilities perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 218, 352-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.013
Zhu, X. and Wu, Y. (2022). How does supply chain resilience affect supply chain performance? the mediating effect of sustainability. Sustainability, 14(21), 14626. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114626
Haryanto, S., & Muslih, M. (2024). Integration of Sufism and Transpersonal Psychology. International Journal of Religion, 5(5), 1041-1047.
Muslih, M., Yahya, Y. K., Haryanto, S., & Musthofa, A. A. (2024). Al-Qur’an-Based Paradigm in Science Integration at The Al-Qur’an Science University, Indonesia. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 80(1), 9459.
Haryanto, S., Poncowati, S. D., Pattiasina, P. J., Astafi, R., & Nugroho, W. (2024). Improving Literacy Skills and Memorisation of Short Verses in Early Childhood. Al-Hijr: Journal of Adulearn World, 3(1).
Haryanto, S. (2024). Relevansi Dimensi Spiritual Terhadap Pendidikan Karakter. Jurnal Keislaman, 7(1), 57-65.
Haryanto, S., & El Syam, R. S. (2024). SPIRITUAL SUFISM IN THE FACT OF THE CREATION OF THE DEVIL SUFISME SPIRITUAL DALAM HAKIKAT PENCIPTAAN IBLIS. Jurnal Pendidikan: Kajian dan Implementasi, 6(1).
Kasmi, M., Abdullah, A., Makkulawu, A. R., Aman, A., & Yusuf, Y. M. (2024). Marine Ornamental Fish Marketing Sustainability Strategy. Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 55(3).
Abdullah, A., Taliang, A., Efendi, B., Kasmi, M., & Aman, A. (2024). Examining The Effects of Entrepreneurial Mindset, Digital Marketing Innovation and Networking on SME Performance. Journal of System and Management Sciences, 14(6), 113-127.
Kasmi, M., Aman, A., Makkulawu, A. R., Amir, S. M., Abdullah, A., & Usman, A. F. (2023). Feasibility Analysis and Production Increase Strategy for Marine Ornamental Fish Agribusiness. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(7), 5689-5698.
Abdullah, A., Dima, A. F., Norvadewi, N., Sutaguna, I. N. T., & Sumarni, S. (2023). SOCIAL MEDIA ON CONSUMER PURCHASE INTENTION IN SHOPEE MARKETPLACE. International Journal of Economics and Management Research, 2(2), 01-10.
Panjaitan, R., Ramdan, A. M., Sawlani, D. K., & Abdullah, A. (2023). The Role Of Market Performance Studies With A Strategic Orientation. Jurnal Manajemen Industri dan Logistik, 6(2), 227-241.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Degdo Suprayitno (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.